Geodomainers Should Spy Fortune’s Articles For Domain Names

June 16, 2008 · by Scott

In a previous post, I emphasized how authoritative sites reinforce trends. When it comes to business and money, you can’t get much more authoritative than CNN Money/Fortune Magazine, who recently released their top 6 real estate bargains. This article was aimed at those looking for retirement homes.

What’s great about this short list is that they also mention adjacent small cities and neighborhoods in which to check out, giving even more material for geodomainers. The list:

  • Miami
  • Las Vegas
  • Phoenix
  • San Diego
  • Tampa
  • Denver

If you can get one of these cities, or neighboring cities, with a good real estate keyword tagged on, you should be able to monetize it.

Remember, “realtor” and “realty” “realtors” are trademarked, so stay away from them.

Update:

Thanks to Dennis H, he pointed out that “realty” was in fact NOT trademarked.

Subscribe to TrendDomaining.com using your favorite reader!

If you like this article, please let people know:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • NewsVine
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
Filed Under Domaining, Geo, Niches, Real Estate, Trends ·  
Related:Identifying Real World Trends And News To Register Domain Names
Related:Forbes Publishes Real Estate List, Geodomainers Find Mother Of All Affiliate Sites

Comments

2 Responses to “Geodomainers Should Spy Fortune’s Articles For Domain Names”

  1. DennisH on June 20th, 2008 1:45 pm

    Are you sure “realty” is trademarked? I know “realtor” is and the national association of realtors own realtor.com, but realty.com is owned by another company and i don’t think they would be able to use it if N.A.R had the trademark.

    Dennis H

  2. Scott on June 20th, 2008 5:52 pm

    I always thought that “realty” was trademarked. But your comment prompted me to look into it and sure enough “realty” is not trademarked. Their trademarks are:

    REALTOR®
    REALTORS®
    REALTOR-ASSOCIATE®

    Thanks Dennis H, I should have double checked that before I posted it.

Leave a Reply




Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional